Paul Sullivan, in his weekly New York Times column, Wealth Matters, writes about Robo Advisers. His article begins as follows:
COMPUTER-GENERATED investment advice has gotten a lot of attention in the last few years. And for good reason.
Many web-based services have given investors with smaller portfolios access to advice that they wouldn’t otherwise get. And because these services charge lower fees — no need to pay human advisers, after all — that can increase returns on investments that track indexes.
But what has not been clear is what benefit, if any, these so-called robo advisers, which help investors with asset allocation and charge a relatively modest fee for the service, bring to high-net-worth investors.
Suffice it to say there is little consensus. And that is probably fair: There are pluses and minuses among the three dominant ways to use technology in personal investing.
Read full article at: The Computer as a Financial Planner – The New York Times
Posted by Lewis J. Saret, Co-General Editor, Wealth Strategies Journal.