David Horton & Reid K. Wesbord have made available for download their forthcoming article, “Boilerplate and Default Rules in Wills Law: An Empirical Analysis,” to be published in the Iowa Law Review, Vol. 102 (2017).  The Abstract is as follows:

The prime directive of wills law is to honor a testator’s intent. As a result, lawmakers take pains to populate the field with majoritarian default rules: those that fill gaps in an estate plan with principles that reflect the wishes of most property owners. However, this Article exposes a phenomenon that undermines these efforts. Using an original, hand-collected dataset of 230 recently-probated wills, it demonstrates that testators routinely opt out of majoritarian default rules through provisions that appear to be boilerplate. This practice is especially prevalent for “non-salient” matters: vital but obscure topics such as the consequences of a beneficiary dying before the testator, how to divide gifts among multi-generational classes, and who must pay mortgages and death taxes. The Article then uses these empirical results to urge judges and legislatures to reconsider the structure of default rules in wills law. Currently, most non-salient topics are governed by “simple” default rules, which yield to any contrary textual command. Conversely, the Article argues that “sticky” defaults, which are harder to displace, would better-insulate a testator’s likely desires from the plague of testamentary boilerplate.

Download full article at: Boilerplate and Default Rules in Wills Law: An Empirical Analysis by David Horton, Reid K. Weisbord :: SSRN

Posted by Lewis J. Saret, Co-General Editor, Wealth Strategies Journal.