A Kafkaesque Estate
Also: Bracing for
Impact: The 2011 Tax Uncuts
By Robert L. Moshman, Esq.
"I have the true feeling of myself
only when I am unbearably unhappy."
-Franz
Kafka
If Franz Kafka were writing a short story
about an estate, it would undoubtedly have featured his signature themes of autobiographic
reflections, alienation, and betrayal while caught in the teeth of a pointless
and irrational bureaucratic nightmare.
Example: You
wake up and discover that you've become a monstrous insect. You find yourself
being interrogated. You are on trial with your colleagues testifying against
you, yet you don't even know what you are being accused of. It is bleak,
surreal, and goes downhill from there. Ahh, good times with Kafka.
Little did Kafka realize that his actual
estate was going to resemble one of his own novels. His unfinished work and
private letters would be saved, scrutinized, modified, and published for more
than 80 years with legal battles over ownership.
The Last Wish
Dying of tuberculosis, Kafka wrote to his
friend and literary executor, Max Brod: "Dearest
Max, my last request: Everything I leave behind me ... in the way of diaries,
manuscripts, letters (my own and others'), sketches, and so on, [is] to be burned
unread."
Needless to say, Brod ignored these
instructions. Brod claims to have told Kafka that he'd ignore such a command,
so his theory is that Kafka gave the instruction knowing that Brod would
disregard it. Empowered by this rationalization, Brod published The Castle, The Trial, and Amerika after Kafka's death. If the end
justifies the means, then the fact that Kafka became one of the most
influential novelists of the 20th century would support Brod's decision, at
least on artistic grounds.
Whether Kafka would have been happy about
these developments is open to interpretation. The ownership of the physical
manuscripts remains the subject of legal debate, even though more than 80 years
have passed.
Infamous Literary Executors
As opposed to standard executors who
administer estates, account for assets, maintain fiduciary duty, and report to
the courts, a "literary executor" is to exercise some discretion over the
publication, sale, and future financial exploitation of artistic creations and
intellectual property rights.
Many literary executors are faithful to
the art they protect, generate value for estates, and enrich our culture. But
the wrong choice of literary executor can have spectacularly bad results. It is
almost a cliché akin to "the butler did it" in a murder mystery: When artists
and authors are betrayed after death...the culprit inevitably seems to be the
"literary executor."
Most infamous in this category would be
Rufus Wilmot Griswold, the literary executor of Edgar Allan Poe. This "executor"
was a character assassin who bore a personal grudge against Poe, insinuated
himself into Poe's affairs, published a defamatory obituary of Poe under a
pseudonym, exploited Poe's work for profit while falsely depicting Poe as a
depraved drug addict, and even forged letters by Poe to back up his claim.
Conclusion: Think twice before naming anyone named "Rufus" as your literary
executor. In fact, just don't do it.
Second place of notoriety would be that
of Elisabeth Förster-Nietzsche,
the younger sister of German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche. Elisabeth had
been married to Bernhard Förster, who founded Neuva Germania in Paraguay in
1887 to demonstrate German superiority but committed suicide in 1893. Elisabeth
returned to Germany when her brother suffered a mental breakdown. After his
death, she published her brother's notes...but modified them to reflect her own
anti-Semitism to support the Nazis. Ironically, Nietzsche is known for
identifying the "will to power" as the driving force of humans (as opposed to Schopenhauer's
"will to live" theme), and Nietzsche's own sister seized power over his
writings.
Unfinished
Works
Artists,
composers, and authors often pass away leaving partially finished works, so
executors have decisions to make about what to publish. Some works end up being
treasured. A famous example is Franz Schubert's Unfinished Symphony. Was it really unfinished? Scholars have
debated this. Two movements were written for the Graz Musical Society and were left
in the care of Anselm Huttenbrenner, who would not otherwise grace the pages of
The Estate Analyst had he not kept
the work a secret and then revealed it 37 years after Schubert's death. In
1928, 100 years after Schubert's death, the Columbia Graphophone Company held a
competition to complete the score; about 100 contestants submitted versions to
complete the work.
There
are a number of other examples. In 1273, St. Thomas Aquinas had a mystical
experience and ceased work on his Summa Theologica.
Leonardo da Vinci designed Il Gran
Cavallo, a horse statue meant to be 24 feet tall; however, the bronze
needed to make it was diverted to make cannon balls, and construction of the
horse was delayed by 500 years. Charles Dickens did not complete The Mystery of Edwin Drood, but the tale
is widely read. Edmund Spenser intended The
Faerie Queene to be 12 books, making it the longest epic poem in the English
language but only completed 6 of the books. J.R.R. Tolkien worked on the Silmarillion for many years, and his son
Christopher Tolkien assembled the work and published it posthumously.
Sir
Edward Elgar is best known in the United States for Pomp and Circumstance, which is played at graduations from
kindergarten through college from coast to coast. In 2003, Miles Hoffman of
National Public Radio traced the genesis of this use back to 1905 when it was
played when an honorary doctorate was bestowed upon Sir Edward at Yale. Soon
Princeton, the University of Chicago, and Columbia followed suit; before long,
it became the essential music for every graduation.
Pomp and Circumstance as America knows it is merely the trio section from
a march that was originally used for the coronation of King Edward VII. It was
one of six marches in Elgar's Opus Number 39. Elgar wrote about 90 pieces that
included songs, concertos, and symphonies. He is held in sufficient esteem in
England to have 65 roadways named after him and to have his likeness appear on
English currency for a number of years. After the death of his wife in 1920,
Elgar retired from public life. But in the last year of his life, he was coaxed
into writing one more piece. Famed playwright George Bernard Shaw and conductor
Ronald Landon persuaded the BBC to commission an Elgar Symphony. Elgar left 130
pages of manuscript. Before dying in 1934, Elgar left contradictory
instructions, saying at one point, "Don't let them tinker with it!" But, at
another point, he also said that perhaps someone else would come along and
complete it "or write a better one." In 1997, composer Anthony Payne
"elaborated" on Elgar's sketches for the Third Symphony and produced a
completed score.
In
2008, it was revealed that the last unfinished work of Vladimir Nabokov,
consisting of 138 index cards of notes, was being held in a Swiss bank vault
while his 73-year-old son deliberated on whether to honor his father's request
to burn it. Nabokov died in 1977, and the unfinished work was locked away.
Writing
in Slate, Ron Rosenbaum weighed in
with his own mixed feelings "to burn or not to burn." Law
Professor Jon Siegel commented in a 2008 blog entitled "Literary Dilemma" that
"[I]f...the reason Nabokov didn't want this manuscript published was his feeling
that it wasn't up to snuff, I say snuff it." (See: http://jsiegel.blogspot.com/2008/01/literary-dilemma.html.)
Then, in 2009, Nabokov's
unfinished work, The Original of Laura,
was published against his wishes. The reviews, summarized in Wikipedia, ranged from "nuclear
accident" to "a generous gift to readers." The original manuscript was expected
to sell at auction for $600,000; however, when bidding stopped at $280,000 in
an auction in December 2009, the sale was abandoned. The book was published (complete with photos of the index
cards and perforations so that the reader can tear them out and rearrange them),
and Playboy magazine purchased rights
to publish serial excerpts of the book. Some feel that Nabokov, a fastidious
perfectionist, would not have approved of an unfinished work being published.
A Kafkaesque Epilogue
As described above, a
struggle over unpublished work isn't unique to Kafka, but the Kafka estate has
been especially convoluted. It wasn't just Max Brod who ignored Franz Kafka's
last request for privacy and the destruction of his letters and unpublished
work. Everyone associated with Kafka has ignored his requests. It is as if
these papers put a spell over anyone who possesses them. When it comes to
valuable papers of artists, there seems to be a 100% failure rate for following
instructions to destroy them.
Kafka's lover, Dora
Diamant, did not destroy correspondence from him as requested. She had 20 of
his notebooks and 33 of his letters that were confiscated by the Gestapo in
1933. Researchers are still trying to track these down. The Kafka Project has
located certain items and released them but is now accused by other researchers
of covering up documents, such as some salacious material that Kafka might have
subscribed to. But the story gets even more Kafkaesque.
Even after publishing the
vast majority of Kafka's unfinished work, Max Brod retained the remaining bits
and pieces of Kafka's writing. He had smuggled them to Israel in 1938. Brod
left his papers (including the Kafka papers) to his secretary/lover, Esther
Hoffe, with the instruction that she give them to an academic institution. Just
as Brod did not follow Kafka's instruction, Hoffe ignored Brod and retained
those items after Brod's death, except for the manuscript of The Trial, which was auctioned at
Sotheby's in 1991 for $1.8 million.
The items remained in
Hoffe's Tel Aviv apartment until her death at the age of 101. Franz Kafka died in 1924. Max Brod died
in 1968. Esther Hoffe died in Tel Aviv in 2007 and left the remaining papers to
her two daughters. But Israel's National Library contends that it is the
rightful owner under Brod's will. The Hoffe heirs claim that their mother
received the papers as a gift and that she had the discretion to bequeath the
papers to institutions of her choice or not at all.
In 2010, under orders from
an Israeli court, experts opened 10 safe-deposit boxes of papers in Israel and
Switzerland to determine just what papers there are and who actually owns them.
Life has imitated art long enough; even Kafka's estate should not continue in
such a Kafkaesque manner.
Post Modern IP Estates
We
live in a new world where it is rare to have a single handwritten letter that
gets saved in a vault for 80 years. Modern texting, tweets, blog postings, and
e-mails get circulated in digital form; once they hit the Internet, they are
beyond the control of the author. Instead of ink and paper in a vault,
information has become digital and can be posted online in the blink of an eye.
This new world also has a
different afterlife for intellectual property rights. Copyrights and trademarks
have extensive periods of value that survive the author's life, and the
connected Internet-based society supplies a vast market for every type of art,
music, writing, or idea.
Several basic precepts
should govern those who own intellectual properties, in light of the lessons of
Kafka and other famous artists and these current conditions:
·
Treat the Internet postings,
e-mails, and text messages as though they were being distributed to everyone in
a public stadium. These communications will invade privacy, dilute intellectual
property values, and allow otherwise protected creations to enter the public
domain.
·
Plan for the ownership and
exploitation of works during life using trusts, LLCs, FLPs, or other entities.
Establish a tax-efficient management model during life, and test-drive it.
·
Don't select a literary
executor named Rufus. Don't rely on any one literary executor. Create an
oversight system with multiple trustees. Plan for the long-term supervision of
intellectual property.
·
Be clear with instructions.
Establish crystal-clear criteria for which letters, e-mails, doodles,
recordings, notes, and manuscripts are published or made available to scholars.
·
Review the lessons of the
Kafka estate, the Nabokov estate, and those of other artists, and learn from
the problems that have affected others.
Bracing for
Impact: The 2011 Tax Uncuts
Ancient Mayan prophecies indicate a
transformative event occurring at the end of the 5,125-year "long count"
calendar by 2012. But there is another transformative event that is scheduled
for arrival somewhat sooner. Behold and beware: Ancient CPAs and tax attorneys
foretell of a perilous time at the End of Days...otherwise known colloquially as
the expiration of the Bush tax cuts on January 1, 2011.
The 120-month-long count leading to the
expiration of tax laws adds a level of Congressional mysticism to tax events
that ordinary tax planners aren't prepared for. The reason for this expiration event--and
the resulting problems--is quite ironic. Congress has been so dysfunctional for
so long that it has adopted rules to force itself to be more responsible (the
"Byrd Rule").
Here's one aspect of the rule: A
provision that is added to a budget reconciliation is considered extraneous if
it raises the deficit beyond the period of time covered by the reconciliation
and can be removed from the reconciliation process. Congress made up this rule
to control itself. Yet Congress also found a way to outsmart itself with a
sunset provision, a rule that will expire. This, of course, has defeated the
purpose of responsible planning.
Thus,
10 years of uncertainty, leading up to billionaire estates arbitrarily escaping
estate taxes in 2010 and concluding with a round-trip back to square one,
resulted from Congress trying to be more responsible and then using a loophole
to trick itself.
As a result of these rules, and as things
stand now, the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, and
all the tax cuts contained therein, is going to expire in 2011. The estate tax
repeal will automatically end. On January 1, 2011, barring a) a responsible act
on the part of Congress or b) a realignment of planets and sun flares that
reverse the geomagnetic polarity of Earth, the estate tax will revert to 2001
levels with a $1-million exemption amount, 55% top estate tax rate, and a stepped-up
basis for appreciated assets held at death. Income tax rates will also increase
across the board, along with taxes on capital gains.
The impact of all of this creates bizarre
and unpredictable tax laws that no Shaman could anticipate--and not just for the
estate tax. Options are wide open.
Among the possible outcomes are:
1)
Automatic reversion to 2001 levels of
taxation by default if Congress fails to take action. This is the leading
contender.
2)
Keeping the 2010 repealed estate tax and
2010 levels for other taxes as well. Very little chance of this. Would require
congressional action and a large level of bipartisanship.
3)
Reverting to 2009 levels just for the
estate tax and addressing other tax cuts in some other manner. A slight chance
of this...but also not likely. The bigger political question of the expiring
income tax cuts is driving the process.
4)
A change that puts the estate tax in a
new place with a top rate of 35% and an exemption at $5 million that is tied to
inflation. This has been suggested by a pair of Senators and resembles other
proposals from 2009. There may be bipartisan support for this, but again, the
income tax aspects of the plan could delay implementation. A key factor of how
capital gains are treated at death remains to be seen.
Bold Prediction: The estate tax returns
with a top rate keyed to the income tax rates, which will be 38% and an
exemption level of $3.5 million tied to inflation. Stepped-up basis returns but
not for the estates that avoided estate taxes during 2010. Bush tax cuts expire
for the higher levels of earners, but capital gains taxes remain at lower
levels. The estate and gift tax systems then get reunited. This is just one
hypothesis that is as good as any. Unfortunately, uncertainty is going to
continue until Congress takes action.

My choice is what I choose to do, and if I'm causing no harm it should not bother you.Your choice is who you choose to be, and if your causing no harm then your alright with me.
London Escort Agencies
buy adult traffic