It
is a situation that many parents and grandparents, particularly those
with significant wealth, dread: the trust fund baby. Think of Benjamin
Braddock in the classic film The Graduate. A young man just out of
college, with his whole life--and his parent's money, as the film
suggests--ahead of him. Why not float around a pool all summer? Who
needs plastics, anyway?
For some children of
wealth and privilege, and the parents who raise them, such a crisis of
motivation can be very real--and certainly not a laughing matter as
portrayed in The Graduate. Today, many wealthy individuals are
employing strategies to prevent the sort of lack of motivation
sometimes found in children of wealth. And ironically enough, the tool
they use is the trust fund--the very thing that sometimes creates
problems in the first place. How do they do it? By establishing what's
known as a Family Incentive Trust.
Traditional trusts accomplish three principal goals: they provide a
method by which parents can administer assets for the benefit of their
children and future generations of their family, save estate, gift and
generation-skipping transfer ("GST") taxes, and protect assets from the
claims of the creditors of the trust beneficiaries. However, many
parents also want to prevent their descendants from becoming dependent
on trust assets and turning into non-productive "trust fund babies".
These parents are aware that second or third generation children with
access to substantial wealth often become entirely dependent on their
parents' and grandparents' legacies, and contribute little, financial
or otherwise, to their families or society. Concerned that trust fund
babies often display low productivity, suffer from low self-esteem and
lack integrity, these parents aim to employ their wealth in a more
dynamic fashion to benefit and preserve their families. Incentive
trusts incorporate provisions to promote and reward productive behavior
as well as accomplish the tax-saving and asset protection provisions
included in traditional trusts.
Traditional trusts typically authorize a trustee to distribute trust
assets irrespective of the manner in which trust beneficiaries conduct
their personal affairs. By comparison, incentive trusts are typically
specifically tailored to promote the grantor's values and goals, and
require that the beneficiaries adhere to the performance standards the
grantor established to be entitled to distributions from the trust.
Incentive trusts are especially attractive to entrepreneurial parents
who earned their wealth. For these parents, the incentive provisions
serve as a form of "financial parenting" that can be tailored to suit
their individual concerns. Entrepreneurial parents generally have a
different work ethic than their children, but are typically satisfied
with their children's values and ethics. However, these parents often
are concerned that their grandchildren have grown up in a very
privileged environment, and as a result, the grandchildren see little
direct connection between work and reward. For these reasons,
incentive trusts generally provide for fixed distributions to the
children and delay implementation of the incentive provisions until the
grandchildren are eligible for distributions.
Structure of Incentive Trusts
The trust agreement is the primary governing document of a family
incentive trust. Parents may achieve their tax savings and asset
protection goals through an incentive trust in much the same way as
with a traditional trust. The "incentive" aspects of the trust are
incorporated into the agreement through cross references to
family-specific exhibits. The incentive trust agreement should be
structured as a perpetual "Dynasty Trust" which is fully exempt from
the GST tax. The agreement should provide for a single trust that
continues in perpetuity, rather than an initial trust that divides into
separate sub-trusts upon the death of a parent or upon the occurrence
of some other triggering event.
The incentive trust agreement should include a Statement of Purpose and
Distribution Guidelines through which the parents accomplish their
goals for their family. The incentive trust agreement must clearly
require that distributions be made in furtherance of the grantor's
Statement of Purpose and in accordance with the Distribution
Guidelines. As with any Dynasty Trust agreement, the incentive trust
agreement may provide for (i) discretionary distributions of income and
principal, (ii) "unitrust" distributions equal to a percentage of the
value of the trust assets, or (iii) distributions of only the income,
and not the principal, of the trust. Deciding how and whether to
distribute trust income and principal will depend upon the amount of
assets contributed to fund the trust, the nature of the assets held by
the trust and the parents' goals for their families.
The Statement of Purpose should include the guiding principles
according to which the trustees, above all else, should administer the
trust. The Statement of Purpose should be broad enough not to hinder
the trustees in administering the trust when unforeseen circumstances
arise, but tailored to truly express the grantor's goals. It should be
clear and irrevocable, but nevertheless a statement that reflects human
values not legal principles. The Statement of Purpose may provide
family background information, such as anecdotal explanations of how
the parents acquired their wealth and why they believe in certain
values. For many families, however, the statement will be more
succinct. As an extremely simple example, a Statement of Purpose might
read as follows: "The purpose of this trust is to ensure that the
descendants of John and Mary Smith will be well provided for, and to
promote productivity, morality, integrity, cooperation and philanthropy
among their descendants."
The Distribution Guidelines should be an attachment to the incentive
trust agreement and be designed to accomplish the parents' goals for
their family. The Distribution Guidelines may be the most important
part of the trust agreement because they set forth the incentive
provisions upon which the entire incentive trust concept is based. As
explained by Marjorie J. Stephens in her article entitled "Incentive
Trusts: Considerations, Uses and Alternatives", 29 ACTEC Journal 5
(Summer 2003), the Distribution Guidelines should provide "a statement
of how the family anticipates that the trust would be carried out
considering the parents' understanding and knowledge of their children,
the economy, and the world today."
The Distribution Guidelines should set forth the circumstances under
which the grantor expects the trustees to distribute or withhold trust
assets in order to provide the trustees a road map for administering
the trust. Thus, unlike an incentive trust's Statement of Purpose, the
Distribution Guidelines must both provide legal guidance and reflect
human values. It is impossible to know with certainty what hurdles the
trustees of a trust will encounter. Moreover, a perpetual trust is
likely to continue for a long time. Accordingly, overly rigid
incentive provisions can have the unintended effect of paralyzing
trustees from being able to adapt trust administration in the face of
unforeseen circumstances. This can be especially problematic when
narrow incentive provisions are incorporated in a trust agreement that
is irrevocable and cannot be amended. Therefore, the incentive
provisions in the Distribution Guidelines should evolve over time as
the need arises.
One of the challenging issues that attorneys often face in drafting an
incentive trust agreement is understanding whether their clients want
to use incentive provisions to elicit positive behavior, discourage
negative behavior, or accomplish some degree of both. Many clients
have broad notions about the kinds of behavior they want to facilitate
or deter, but find it challenging to focus their general ideas into
incentive provisions that can actually be administered by trustees.
For example, many clients feel strongly that no child should receive
trust assets before he or she is mature and has proven that he or she
can manage his or her affairs responsibly. However, the clients may
not be able to describe their view of "sufficiently mature" in
adequately precise terms to be incorporated into an incentive trust
agreement. An experienced attorney can be of great help in steering
clients through the process by helping them draft the Distribution
Guidelines.
The grantor should authorize the trustees to amend the Distribution
Guidelines. Generally, incentive trust agreements designate a single
Administrative Trustee to serve during the lifetime of the grantor and
the grantor's spouse. Thereafter, the incentive trust would be
administered by an Administrative Trustee together with a Board of
Trustees consisting of a group of persons named in the incentive trust
agreement. The individual Administrative Trustee, and later the Board
of Trustees, is typically authorized to amend the Distribution
Guidelines.
The incentive trust agreement sets forth how the incentive trust would
be administered. The Administrative Trustee typically handles the
day-to-day affairs of the incentive trust and makes distributions
pursuant to the Distribution Guidelines. The Board of Trustees decides
what the terms of the Distribution Guidelines should be and how the
Distribution Guidelines should evolve over time, consistent with the
grantor's Statement of Purposes. The Board of Trustees also determines
the overall policy of the trust concerning investments and other
matters. The incentive trust agreement should identify the
Administrative Trustee and the initial members of the Board of
Trustees, and set forth procedures for electing their successors. As
with the designation of the Administrative Trustee, there is no fixed
formula for deciding who should serve on the Board of Trustees.
However, in every case, the Administrative Trustee should serve on this
Board, together with at least one trustee elected by the beneficiaries.
If the incentive trust agreement provides for distributions to charity
(i.e., by requiring that income not otherwise distributed to the
individual beneficiaries in accordance with the Distribution Guidelines
be paid to charity), a charitable representative also should serve on
the Board of Trustees. It may be prudent to include a tax advisor on
the Board of Trustees, who would either be an attorney or an
accountant, as well as the person principally responsible for managing
the incentive trust assets. To that end, if the trust corpus is
comprised of interests in a closely held business, that person might be
the chief executive officer or chief financial officer of the
business. If corpus consists primarily of real estate, that person
might be the asset manager. Or, if the incentive trust holds
securities, the financial planner or a representative of the trust
company, bank or investment house might serve on the Board of
Trustees. Lastly, parents may want to consider including family
counselors, trusted business associates or senior family members on the
Board of Trustees.
Under the laws of most states, the members of the board of trustees
will be subject to the duties and liabilities typically imposed on
fiduciaries. Many brokerage houses, banks, and professional firms
prohibit their partners and employees from serving as trustees to
protect them from potential fiduciary liability. As an alternative, the
incentive trust may be established under Delaware law, which could
permit a board of advisors (who are not fiduciaries) to direct the
Administrative Trustee in much the same capacity as a board of trustees.
The Board of Trustees should act by vote upon terms set forth in the
incentive trust agreement. The Board of Trustees controls the
Distribution Guidelines. Accordingly, parents should think carefully
about the level of voting power they want to give to the beneficiaries,
through the trustees they elect. In most cases, the trustees elected
by the beneficiaries should not constitute more than 40 percent of the
voting members of the Board of Trustees.
The incentive trust agreement also should set forth the manner in which
the Board of Trustees operates. At a minimum, the Board of Trustees
should meet once a year to review the trust distributions for the prior
year and consider whether revisions should be made to the Distribution
Guidelines. The annual meeting of the Board of Trustees should be
coordinated with an annual meeting of the beneficiaries. The
Administrative Trustee should prepare a full accounting each year and
deliver it to the Board of Trustees and each beneficiary (or his or her
guardian) for review at their annual meetings, together with detailed
agendas for their meetings. In this manner, the Board of Trustees'
role is comparable to that of a board of directors of a corporation;
the role of the beneficiaries is comparable to that of the shareholders.
Parents may consider authorizing trust beneficiaries to submit special
distribution proposals, much like grant proposals, to the Board of
Trustees for consideration at the annual meeting. A special
distribution proposal may solicit financial support to enable a
beneficiary to pursue an internship, new business venture, missionary
activity, artistic endeavor or other matters not addressed by the
existing Distribution Guidelines. The Board of Trustees would approve
or reject a special distribution proposal based on the members'
interpretation of the Statement of Purposes and the parents' goals for
establishing the incentive trust.
Wealthy people are often philanthropic. Historically, philanthropic
individuals have allocated their assets among trusts for family members
and separate trusts, foundations or outright bequests for charity,
often in a relatively arbitrary manner. However, charitably inclined
parents may find the incentive trust to be an attractive vehicle for
furthering both family goals and philanthropic goals through one trust.
Providing for charity in an incentive trust can be accomplished through
a multitude of techniques. Parents may provide that excess net cash
flow remaining after the trustees make distributions to family
beneficiaries in accordance with Distribution Guidelines must be paid
to charity on an annual basis. Alternatively, parents may limit the
total distributions each year to a fixed percentage of the value of the
trust assets and direct that net cash flow remaining after
distributions are made to family beneficiaries pursuant to the
Distribution Guidelines must be paid to charity.
Parents can specify the charitable beneficiary in the incentive trust
instrument, authorize a Philanthropic Committee to select the
charitable beneficiaries, or provide for a combination of procedures.
As a general rule, trust income will be calculated in accordance with
generally accepted fiduciary accounting principles interpreted under
the applicable state law, such that dividends and rents will be
allocated to income while proceeds from sales or refinancings of assets
will be allocated to principal. A parent may prefer a "unitrust"
concept for his or her incentive trust, so that the trustees would
distribute a fixed percentage of the value of the trust assets to the
beneficiaries, regardless of how much traditional income is generated
in a given year.
Goals an Incentive Trust Can Accomplish
Distribution Guidelines can be drafted to accomplish almost any goal.
As every parent has a unique set of values, an attorney who is asked to
draft an incentive trust should first set out to address those values.
Since an incentive trust is essentially a surrogate for the parents,
designed to emulate the terms on which parents would personally
administer the trust assets, the draftsman must begin by gaining a
broad understanding of the parents' priorities. This is best
accomplished by securing the parents' answers to a series of questions.
1. What values do the parents want to promote and how should the trust promote them?
How would the parents administer the assets they plan to transfer to
the incentive trust, if they were to live forever? Many parents share
similar goals of ensuring that their descendants will be productive,
happy, fulfilled and well provided for. What sort of monitoring would
the parents engage in to determine whether descendants are worthy of
distributions? Would age be a primary concern? Would hard work,
involvement with charities, education, commitment to family, or some
other factor be of significant importance? What are the parents'
priorities? Only with a complete understanding of the parents' goals
can the attorney translate the plan into succinct Distribution
Guidelines.
2. What Incentive Provisions Should be Included in the Incentive Trust Agreement?
Do the parents want provisions concerning education in the incentive
trust agreement? Parents often desire to promote education, but
hesitate to make outright gifts to their descendants for fear that they
will waste the funds and forego schooling. Incentive provisions can
work well in such instances, by directing the trustees to pay for the
education of the beneficiaries up to a level specified by the parents.
The Distribution Guidelines may set a performance standard (i.e., a
1.75 grade point average) that beneficiaries must achieve in order to
receive continued support. The Distribution Guidelines also may
provide for levels of support (i.e., room and board of up to two times
the cost of on-campus housing for students).
Do the parents want provisions concerning internships in the incentive
trust agreement? Distribution Guidelines can provide interesting
"internship" opportunities for trust beneficiaries. A typical dilemma
for many young people entering the work place is that they cannot get a
start on their ideal careers without experience, but cannot afford the
salary sacrifices necessary to gain experience through internships.
Distribution Guidelines can authorize living expense stipends for
beneficiaries completing internships that provide valuable experience
but limited or no pay. If the trust holds a family business, the
Distribution Guidelines may set forth the terms and conditions upon
which a family member would participate in internships within the
company, to gain experience and better understand the family's business
before securing additional experience outside the company.
Do the parents want provisions concerning income matching in the
incentive trust agreement? For adult beneficiaries, the Distribution
Guidelines may provide for payments based on a sliding scale.
Essentially, the beneficiaries' work is assigned numerical values for
its social value and compensation level. The trustees would then make
distributions to the beneficiaries under a mathematical formula
incorporating the social and salary values of each beneficiary's
profession, limited by a numerical cap. For example, a beneficiary in
a profession with a low salary but high moral value (for example, a
guidance counselor for children with special needs) may be entitled to
a trust distribution equal to three or four times his or her salary. A
beneficiary in a high salary profession with less moral value (for
example, a tax lawyer or investment banker) would receive a lower
multiple, subject to the cap. In rather simplistic terms,
beneficiaries would be encouraged to pursue their individual goals to
either 'contribute to society' or 'generate additional family wealth',
while still being able to live in the same neighborhood.
If the parents include incentive compensation provisions of this type
in their Distribution Guidelines, they must also anticipate the effect
of a beneficiary leaving the workplace to care for children. Since
most parents who create incentive trusts wish to support descendants
who choose to raise families, it may be appropriate to consider
household income when a beneficiary chooses to stay at home.
Therefore, if a beneficiary leaves the workplace to care for her
children, moral and salary values could be assigned by reference to her
spouse's profession for purposes of determining trust distributions.
Alternatively, the Distribution Guidelines could look to the historic
distributions paid to the beneficiary, adjusted to account for
inflation. In all other cases, moral and salary values would be
assigned solely based on the beneficiary's performance.
Do the parents want provisions concerning crisis and counseling in the
incentive trust agreement? Distribution Guidelines can authorize
distributions, in the discretion of the trustees, to help beneficiaries
in crisis situations, such as divorce or separation, or during periods
of involuntary unemployment. They also can authorize distributions to
provide counseling for beneficiaries suffering from marital, substance
abuse or any other personal problems. The Distribution Guidelines may
also assist young beneficiaries with college placement and career
counseling assistance.
Do the parents want other typical distribution provisions?
Distribution Guidelines typically provide for other less controversial
distributions, such as payments for (i) health insurance and
unreimbursed medical expenses, (ii) support of beneficiaries with
special needs, and (iii) maintenance of vacation homes and other family
assets. Distribution Guidelines also often entitle beneficiaries who
retire after attaining a specified age (i.e., 55) to annual payments
equal to the average distributions they received in recent years,
increased by the applicable Consumer Price Index factor.
Do the parents want provisions that "punish" a beneficiary's bad
behavior? In many cases, "punishing" provisions designed to discourage
negative behavior (for example, substance abuse) by prohibiting
distributions to beneficiaries who engage in such behavior are
unnecessary if "encouraging" provisions are properly drafted. For
example, a parent wishing to discourage substance abuse might be
tempted to include a provision that allows (or requires) the trustees
to withhold distributions from beneficiaries known to be engaging in
such abuse. The parent also might wish to require the trustees to
consult with other family members to ascertain which beneficiaries, if
any, are engaging in substance abuse. However, if the "encouraging"
provisions of the trust agreement provide for distributions that reward
positive behavior, such as hard work and productivity - behaviors that
a substance abuser is unlikely to exhibit - the prohibition on
distributions to substance abusers should be adequately addressed de
facto by the more encouraging incentive provisions. Moreover, such
punitive provisions would discourage a beneficiary from asking the
trustees for assistance with appropriate counseling before his
substance abuse reaches a crisis stage. Shaping behavior through
encouragement is often more effective than controlling behavior through
punishment, so attorneys and parents should be wary of "punishing"
provisions. |
Leave a comment