| Paul D. Pearlstein |
|
| Washington, D.C. | |
I. Some Questions and Answers Q. May a solvent or insolvent probate estate be a debtor in bankruptcy and obtain the protection of the bankruptcy court? Q. May a trust be a debtor in bankruptcy? Q. Must a debtor be insolvent to file a bankruptcy and obtain relief? Q. If a debtor in bankruptcy dies, may the decedent's bankruptcy estate continue or must it be dismissed? Q. May a Conservator, Guardian or Attorney in Fact file a bankruptcy for their subject? Q. Can a pending foreclosure of property of a probate estate be stopped by the filing of a bankruptcy? Q.
Is there a probate exception to bankruptcy law when there is a conflict
between a state probate court and a bankruptcy court? Q.
If a property is infested with liens, litigation and title problems,
can the bankruptcy court help to sell the property and maximize the
value? Q. Can a disclaimer be considered an avoidable fraudulent transfer? Q. Is the power to disclaim property of an estate, property of a bankrupt estate? Q.
What is the effect on the property of a probate estate if a Personal
Representative, heir, beneficiary or claimant, with a potential but not
determined interest in property of the estate, files for bankruptcy? Q. What is the fraudulent transfer statute of limitations for a transfer to a "self settled [asset protection] trust." Q. May a bankruptcy court probate a will or administer an estate of a deceased debtor? Q. Can the trustee of a bankrupt estate be a survivor of a joint tenancy with a deceased co tenant? II. Bankruptcy 101 Bankruptcy courts have many unusual and extraordinary powers. The bankruptcy law can be found in 11 U.S.C. § 101, et seq. a. Automatic Stay Upon the bare filing of a bankruptcy petition, an automatic stay is imposed to protect the debtor from almost all creditors. 11 U.S.C. § 362. b. Types of Bankruptcy There are six types of bankruptcy:
c. Who May Be A Debtor In Bankruptcy Section 109 describes who may be a debtor. For our purposes it is more important to note that a decedent's estate may not be a debtor in bankruptcy. However, a Conservator or Guardian may be a bankruptcy debtor as may a trust and an Attorney in Fact. d. Property of the Estate Much like the IRS definition of income, § 541 indicates that almost any kind of interest in property is property of the bankruptcy estate unless the Code says that it is excluded. Such property of the estate will be protected by the automatic stay and will be administered by the trustee. For our purposes this means that if a personal representative, trustee, heir, beneficiary or claimant declares bankruptcy, the bankruptcy laws (automatic stay, avoidance powers, etc.) will affect the probate testate property that they may have an interest in. While an estate cannot declare bankruptcy to stop a foreclosure, anyone with an interest in the property can file and stop the foreclosure until such time as the court grants relief from the stay. e. Avoidance Powers
f. Discharge of Debt Each of these bankruptcy chapters have the ability to discharge or otherwise alter the debt of a debtor.
The rules regarding a discharge in each chapter differ and they must all be read within the context of § 523 Exceptions to discharge. Section 523 is not in the chapter series (i.e., the 700s, 900s, 1100s, 1200s, and 1300s) but is generic to all of the chapters subject to the exceptions variances of each of the chapter discharge sections. g. Restructuring Debt In addition to the discharge of debt, some of the bankruptcy chapters allow the alteration of the terms and conditions of debt, both unsecured and secured. Chapters 9, 11, 12 and 13 provide for such powers while Chapter 7 only discharges some or all of the debt depending upon the sum recovered by the trustees liquidation of the estate property, if any. III. Conclusion Bankruptcy is one more tool that the probate and intervention practitioner may use: to administer their estate; to maximize the value of assets; and, to fulfill the fiduciary duties required. It is always a good day when a foreclosure can be avoided; fraudulently transferred money returned to an estate or problematic properties sold at a fair price. These are things the bankruptcy courts can do . Bankruptcy law is constantly in flux and the new Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA) makes life even more interesting. More so than most trial courts, decisions of bankruptcy courts are frequently published. These trial court decisions are often in conflict with each other. The decisions reflect many different approaches and solutions to the same problems presented. Relatively few bankruptcy case have gone to the U.S. Circuit courts and fewer still to the U.S. Supreme Court. The law is developing as we speak and with the advent of the radical 2005 amendments to the Code, there is much left to interpret. How this will affect probate law is unclear but even with the unanimous but very narrow decision in the Anna Nicole case, we see that the "probate exception" is still in play and its future is unclear. Some local bankruptcy cases involving probate are listed in the addendum.
CASE ADDENDUM District of Columbia In re Sandra Dockery. Mann v. McCarthy, 116 B. R. 1 (Bankr. D.C. 1990). In re B & W Management, Inc. Brown v. Brown, 63 B.R. 395 (Bankr. D.C. 1986). Only a "person" may be a debtor in bankruptcy and not a decedent's estate. Virginia Murry v. Mares, 147 B.R. 688 (E.D. Va. 1992). A bankrupt debtor surviving spouse may not prevent the probate of her late husband's estate on the theory that her interest in the decedent's estate is property of her estate and therefore affected and protected by the automatic stay stemming from her case. In re Edna J. Valentine, 2007 WL 39120 (Bankr. E.D. Va.). Bankruptcy court had no jurisdiction to review rulings made by a [DC] probate court relating to tort and fraud claims. These claims were brought as an adversary proceeding in the bankruptcy case by the assignee of the claims (assigned to him by the bankruptcy trustee.) Probate court's rulings on the issues were res judicata. In re Charles R. Farrior. Wolfe (Trustee) v. Farrior, et al, 344 B.R. 483 (Bankr. W.D. Va. 2006). When a debtor in bankruptcy has disclaimer rights in a will as personal representative of a decedent, the disclaimer rights are property of the debtor's estate and may be administered by the bankruptcy trustee. In re Angela H. Brown, Shaia v. Estate of Winfree Brown, 1996 WL 757100 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1996) A bankrupt debtor's interest in property of the estate may be successfully waived by a properly drafted and executed Property Settlement Agreement. In re Dwight E. Avis, 1996 WL 910911 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1996) When the debtor's interest in a trust was not effectively scheduled and disclosed, the case may be reopened and the trustee may administer the assets of the trust. Maryland In re Donna J. Monroe. Friedman v. Juratovac, 2003 WL 22038534 (Bankr. D. Md. 2003). When a debtor held a joint tenancy with rights of survivorship pre petition, the trustee then has only the debtor's interest in a tenancy in common since the 4 unities have been broken by the transfer of the debtor's portion of his joint interest in the joint tenancy to the estate. In re Marilyn E. Roberts, 2005 WL 3108224 (Bankr. D. Md. 2005) A personal representative of an insolvent estate may not file a bankruptcy for the decedent's estate. A decedent's estate is not a person and therefore may not be a debtor in bankruptcy. 11 U.S.C, § 109(a) In re Howard L. Klienman, 274 B.R. 171 (Bankr. D. Md. 2002). Debtor's interest in life insurance proceeds for his deceased wife is exempt and not available to creditors per Maryland law. Maryland Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, Sec 11-504(b)(2). In re Fife Symington, III, 209 B.R. 678 (Bankr. D. Md. 1997). Debtor (then serving as Governor of Arizona) filed her Chapter 7 bankruptcy case in Arizona. The Arizona bankruptcy court issued an order allowing creditors to examine the financial records of debtor's mother (Martha F. Symington) a resident of Maryland. The Maryland bankruptcy court issued a subpoena against the resident mother to produce the documents requested. Subsequently the original debtor (Governor of Arizona) was indicted and her mother (Martha F. Symington, the Maryland resident) died. The records requested were never produced by the deceased mother's personal representative despite the Arizona court order and the Maryland subpoena. The creditors then moved to substitute a new personal representative for Martha F. Symington's probate estate in light of the conduct of the original personal representative. This court granted an order substituting the personal representative of Martha Symington's probate estate, reasoning that the mother's probate estate was eligible to be subject to a bankruptcy examination as an "entity" per Bankruptcy Rules 2004 and 9014.
1 With appreciation for the presentation of Hon. S. Martin Teel, Jr., David Lynn, Esquire and Darrell W. Clark, Esquire to the DC Bar's Estates, Trusts and Probate Law Section luncheon on October 20, 2005. Their handout may be purchased from the DC Bar. | |

Bankruptcy And Probate
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Bankruptcy And Probate.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.wealthstrategiesjournal.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/40
Leave a comment