In
Uzyel v. Kadisha,
116 Cal. Rptr. 3d 244 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010), a California intermediate
appellate court issued a decision comprehensively interpreting Probate
Code § 16440 governing remedies for breach of trust. The court held
that tracing is not required as a prerequisite to disgorgement of
profits; the fact that an act is consistent with the duty to invest
prudently does not excuse a breach of the duty of loyalty including
liability for appreciation damages; a determination of which measure of
liability is appropriate under the section is reviewed for abuse of
discretion; an investment loss resulting from breach of trust can be
offset against a profit resulting from a breach "only if the breaches
were not separate and distinct"; and an award of prejudgment interest
on damages resulting from breach of trust is mandatory.
Click here to read the court decision.
Hat tip: Wills, Trust & Estates Prof Blog
Posted by Yi Song, Associate
Editor, Wealth Strategies Journal.
Leave a comment