Joshua Tree Enterprises

Sign Up for Newsletter

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Associate Editor published on January 19, 2011 12:19 AM.

February 1, 2011: Life Care Planning and Estate Planning: What Every Attorney Needs to Know About the Differences was the previous entry in this blog.

Paul Sullivan, Exploring Trusts for the Disabled is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Trustee Liability for Breach of Trust

TrackBacks (0) Comments (0)

In Uzyel v. Kadisha, 116 Cal. Rptr. 3d 244 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010), a California intermediate appellate court issued a decision comprehensively interpreting Probate Code § 16440 governing remedies for breach of trust. The court held that tracing is not required as a prerequisite to disgorgement of profits; the fact that an act is consistent with the duty to invest prudently does not excuse a breach of the duty of loyalty including liability for appreciation damages; a determination of which measure of liability is appropriate under the section is reviewed for abuse of discretion; an investment loss resulting from breach of trust can be offset against a profit resulting from a breach "only if the breaches were not separate and distinct"; and an award of prejudgment interest on damages resulting from breach of trust is mandatory.

Click here to read the court decision.

Hat tip: Wills, Trust & Estates Prof Blog

Posted by Yi Song, Associate Editor, Wealth Strategies Journal.


0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Trustee Liability for Breach of Trust.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.wealthstrategiesjournal.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4545

Leave a comment