Joshua Tree Enterprises

Sign Up for Newsletter

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Associate Editor published on September 8, 2010 12:05 AM.

Wayne E. Nix, Lee G. Knight, and Ray A. Knight: New Life for Charitable Lids was the previous entry in this blog.

Court Case Gives Hope to Holders of Off-shore Interests Facing FBAR Penalty is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

IN RE ESTATE OF CATLIN

TrackBacks (0) Comments (0)

The Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, wrote an opinion regarding lost wills in the case of In re Estate of Catlin, 311 S.W.3d 697 (Tex. App. - Amarillo 2010, pet. denied).  Specifically, the court found that the proponent did not have to demonstrate an affirmative reason for why the original will could not be located and allowed the proponent to rely upon a copy.  This opinion makes it more difficult for a testator to revoke a will by physical act since the burden of demonstrating the revocation is no longer on the proponent.  The case also highlights the importance of clearly specifying methods of revocation in a will.

 

Please click here to read the entire opinion.

 

Posted by Shahzeb Gaziani, Senior Associate Editor, Wealth Strategies Journal.

 

 

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: IN RE ESTATE OF CATLIN.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.wealthstrategiesjournal.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3840

Leave a comment