Joshua Tree Enterprises

Sign Up for Newsletter

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Associate Editor published on April 23, 2010 1:03 AM.

Steve Akers's Summary of Holman v. Commissioner, 105 AFTR 2d ¶ 2010-721 (8th Cir. April 7, 2010) was the previous entry in this blog.

Washington Post: Goldman Sachs and the Revolt of the Lower Upper Class is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Guest vs. Hansen

TrackBacks (0) Comments (0)

The New York Law Journal has posted Guest vs. Hansen, which was decided on April 20, 2010. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second circuit held that an administrator who is a beneficiary of an estate may represent the estate pro se, so long as the estate has no other beneficiaries or creditors. The Court had previously ruled that "an administr[ator] or execut[or] of an estate may not proceed pro se when the estate has beneficiaries or creditors other than the litigant," but had reserved the question of a sole beneficiary administrator.

Posted by Patrick Siegfried, Associate Editor, Wealth Strategies Journal.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Guest vs. Hansen.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.wealthstrategiesjournal.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3161

Leave a comment