Joshua Tree Enterprises

Sign Up for Newsletter

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Associate Editor published on February 25, 2010 9:11 AM.

Tax Notes Article: Senate Approves Jobs Bill was the previous entry in this blog.

Tax Correspondence to IRS: To Prevent Discouarging Charitable Giving, IRS Should Hold Section 2511(c) Inapplicable to Transfers to Qualified Charitable Remainder Trusts is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Tax Notes Article by Jay Starkman: "Can an Estate Tax Be Retroactive?"

TrackBacks (0) Comments (1)

Tax Notes has published an article by Jay Starkman, CPA.  The article emphatically states that retroactive tax law is constitutional, and provides historical support and case precedent for this premise.   

See Jay Starkman, "Can an Estate Tax Be Retroactive?" 2010 TNT 37-10, February 25, 2010, or click here to access the article.

Posted by Neil I. Rumbak, Associate Editor, Wealth Strategies Journal. 


0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Tax Notes Article by Jay Starkman: "Can an Estate Tax Be Retroactive?".

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.wealthstrategiesjournal.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2836

1 Comments

Retroactivity is not particularly relevant until Congress passes a retroactive bill. The question at this time is whether a retroactive bill can make it through both houses. The likelihood of retroactivity is inversely proportional to the number of estates of the politically powerful which will be affected. Had Ted Kennedy died this year, leaving an estate subject not only to the 16% Massachusetts levy but also potentially subject to a retroative federal 45% tax on the remainder, you can bet that the sympathy card would be pulled on behalf of his grieving widow and other beneficiaries. Who would want to take money from his disabled son? As of now, retroactivity is a political, not a fiscal or legal, issue.

Leave a comment