Joshua Tree Enterprises

Sign Up for Newsletter

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Associate Editor published on August 31, 2009 7:32 PM.

Tax Policy Center Estimates 2012 Distribution of Federal Tax Rates was the previous entry in this blog.

Tax Court Memorandum by Thomas B. Wells: "Suzanne J. Pierre v. Commissioner" is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Court Memorandum by Judge John D. Rainey, "Rayford Keller et al. v. United States"

TrackBacks (0) Comments (7)

John D. Rainey, a judge for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, has decided in the favor of the Rayford Keller, plaintiff, in his case against the United States government. The plaintiff asserted that his party was entitled to an estate tax refund, and further tax deductions for various administrative costs. The disagreement over the refund stemmed from the nature of the partnership that was to be formed before the death of Rayford Keller's client, Mrs. Maude O'Connor Williams. Although all partnership procedures were not completed before Mrs. Williams' death, the district court found that Mrs. Williams had intended to fully complete the partnership agreement. Hence, the court granted the estate tax refund as well as further tax deductions due to certain administrative costs such as litigation fees and the like.

See Tax Analysts, "Court Orders Estate Tax Refund, Allows Deduction for Administrative Costs," 2009 TNT 162-3, August 20, 2009

Posted by Raj Chudgar, Associate Editor, Wealth Strategies Journal

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Court Memorandum by Judge John D. Rainey, "Rayford Keller et al. v. United States".

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.wealthstrategiesjournal.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2203

7 Comments

The respondent found issue with the actions of the petitioner, asserting that the petitioner was liable under CRAT anti-abuse regulation and additionally owed taxes from capital gain income generated from the partnership Latin escorts London best penis enlargement pills

AjayBaji Author Profile Page on May 13, 2011 2:20 AM

The respondent found issue with the actions of the petitioner, asserting that the petitioner was liable under CRAT anti-abuse regulation and additionally owed taxes from capital gain income generated from the partnership. However, the court decided that the deficiency notice was invalid as it was issued before the conclusion of partnership-level proceedings Kensington Escorts Penis Pump

AjayBaji Author Profile Page on May 13, 2011 12:59 PM

However, the court decided that the deficiency notice was invalid as it was issued before the conclusion of partnership-level proceedings London Escort Agency Lifestyle

A truly good judge, who believes in allowing cases to go to trial and not deciding them on motions. A pleasure to try a case with.Mayfair Escorts
Canary Wharf escorts

Ngày 01: Huế - Đà Nẵng – Hội An (Trưa, Tối)

Sáng: 06h00 Xe và hướng dẫn đón đoàn tại điểm tập kết trong thành phố Huế đi Đà Nẵng. Trên đường đi ghé tham quan Ngũ Hành Sơn, đi Hội An nhận phòng khác sạn.

Ngày 01: Huế - Đà Nẵng – Hội An (Trưa, Tối)

Sáng: 06h00 Xe và hướng dẫn đón đoàn tại điểm tập kết trong thành phố Huế đi Đà Nẵng. Trên đường đi ghé tham quan Ngũ Hành Sơn, đi Hội An nhận phòng khác sạn.

Chiều:

Tối: Ăn tối nhà hàng.Tham quan phố cổ về đêm.

Ngày 02: Hội An – Huế (Sáng ,Trưa)

Sáng: Ăn sáng, tham quan tour Hội An: nhà cổ Phùng Hưng, chùa Cầu, hội quán Phúc Kiến, tham quan xưởng sản xuất thủ công mỹ nghệ... Ăn trưa tại nhà hàng. Trả phòng

Chiều: Xe đón đoàn trở về Huế, trên đường đi ghé tham quan bảo tàng Chàm. Tiếp tục ra Huế trả khách tại điểm đón ban đầu.

Kết thúc chương trình

Giá tour trọn gói: 935.000 đ/khách (Áp dụng cho đoàn từ 35 khách trở lên)

890.000 đ/khách (Áp dụng cho đoàn từ 45 khách trở lên)

lady-killer Author Profile Page on July 22, 2011 9:11 AM

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' Proposed Calculation of Deductions. (Dkt. No. 90). Having considered the proposal, objections, responses, replies, record, and relevant law, the Court is of the opinion that Plaintiffs are entitled to a deduction in the amount of $60,357,085.39. live sex
xadultbook

Leave a comment